Azerbaijan vs Kiribati: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps over time
- Azerbaijan
- Kiribati
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 817,785 current US$ against 691,990 current US$ in Kiribati, a difference of 125,795 current US$.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.2 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 82nd and Kiribati ranks 84th of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 160,000 current US$ | 60,000 current US$ | 100,000 current US$ | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 158,350 current US$ | 418,574 current US$ | 260,223 current US$ | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps, Azerbaijan or Kiribati?
- Azerbaijan, at 817,785 current US$ against 691,990 current US$ in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps between Azerbaijan and Kiribati?
- 125,795 current US$, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Kiribati?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Azerbaijan and Kiribati rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps?
- Azerbaijan ranks 82nd and Kiribati ranks 84th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) with 495 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.