Azerbaijan vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps
Azerbaijan
817,785 current US$
in 2023
Latvia
820,000 current US$
in 2003
Azerbaijan rank
82nd
Latvia rank
81st
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps over time
- Azerbaijan
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 820,000 current US$ against 817,785 current US$ in Azerbaijan, a difference of 2,215 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 82nd and Latvia ranks 81st of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.65 million current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 1.64 million current US$ | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 242,500 current US$ | 318,750 current US$ | 76,250 current US$ | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps, Azerbaijan or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 820,000 current US$ against 817,785 current US$ in Azerbaijan as of 2003.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps between Azerbaijan and Latvia?
- 2,215 current US$, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Latvia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2003.
- How do Azerbaijan and Latvia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps?
- Azerbaijan ranks 82nd and Latvia ranks 81st of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) with 495 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.