Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps

Bosnia and Herzegovina
6.11 million current US$
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
7.07 million current US$
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
35th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
32nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M196419932023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 7.07 million current US$ against 6.11 million current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 959,550 current US$.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.2 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 35th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 32nd of 154 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 26.81 million current US$ 10.21 million current US$ 16.60 million current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 9.18 million current US$ 16.49 million current US$ 7.31 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 3.30 million current US$ 6.82 million current US$ 3.52 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 4.13 million current US$ 8.57 million current US$ 4.44 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 7.07 million current US$ against 6.11 million current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tanzania, United Republic of?
959,550 current US$, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tanzania, United Republic of?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 35th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 32nd of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-gaps-filled/bosnia-and-herzegovina/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-gaps-filled/bosnia-and-herzegovina/tanzania/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 9,001 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) with 495 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.