Congo vs Kosovo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps over time
- Congo
- Kosovo
How they compare
Kosovo currently reports 1.20 million current US$ against 1.10 million current US$ in Congo, a difference of 100,240 current US$.
That makes Kosovo's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 69th and Kosovo ranks 66th of 154 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Kosovo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.96 million current US$ | 3.28 million current US$ | 25.68 million current US$ | Congo |
| 2010s | 10.17 million current US$ | 1.16 million current US$ | 9.01 million current US$ | Congo |
| 2020s | 583,074 current US$ | 1.24 million current US$ | 658,677 current US$ | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps, Congo or Kosovo?
- Kosovo, at 1.20 million current US$ against 1.10 million current US$ in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps between Congo and Kosovo?
- 100,240 current US$, with Kosovo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Kosovo?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Kosovo rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps?
- Congo ranks 69th and Kosovo ranks 66th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) with 495 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.