Congo vs Russia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current) … Italy gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current) … Italy gaps over time
- Congo
- Russia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 1.10 million current US$ against 1.02 million current US$ in Russia, a difference of 80,320 current US$.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Russia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 69th and Russia ranks 71st of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Russia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18.11 million current US$ | 4.61 million current US$ | 13.50 million current US$ | Congo |
| 2000s | 638,000 current US$ | 39.14 million current US$ | 38.50 million current US$ | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps, Congo or Russia?
- Congo, at 1.10 million current US$ against 1.02 million current US$ in Russia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps between Congo and Russia?
- 80,320 current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Russia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Congo and Russia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps?
- Congo ranks 69th and Russia ranks 71st of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) with 495 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.