Estonia vs Laos: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current) … Italy gaps
Estonia
140,000 current US$
in 2003
Laos
119,973 current US$
in 2022
Estonia rank
109th
Laos rank
111th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current) … Italy gaps over time
- Estonia
- Laos
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 140,000 current US$ against 119,973 current US$ in Laos, a difference of 20,027 current US$.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.2 times Laos's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 109th and Laos ranks 111th of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Laos in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 85,625 current US$ | 56,875 current US$ | 28,750 current US$ | Estonia |
| 2000s | 85,000 current US$ | 352,500 current US$ | 267,500 current US$ | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps, Estonia or Laos?
- Estonia, at 140,000 current US$ against 119,973 current US$ in Laos as of 2003.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps between Estonia and Laos?
- 20,027 current US$, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Laos?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2003.
- How do Estonia and Laos rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps?
- Estonia ranks 109th and Laos ranks 111th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) with 495 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.