Kazakhstan vs Romania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps over time
- Kazakhstan
- Romania
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 4.20 million current US$ against 3.17 million current US$ in Romania, a difference of 1.03 million current US$.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.3 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Romania ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 37th and Romania ranks 40th of 154 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 107,500 current US$ | 571,667 current US$ | 464,167 current US$ | Romania |
| 2000s | 41,333 current US$ | 1.54 million current US$ | 1.50 million current US$ | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps, Kazakhstan or Romania?
- Kazakhstan, at 4.20 million current US$ against 3.17 million current US$ in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps between Kazakhstan and Romania?
- 1.03 million current US$, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Romania?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2004.
- How do Kazakhstan and Romania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps?
- Kazakhstan ranks 37th and Romania ranks 40th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) with 495 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.