Latvia vs Serbia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps
Latvia
820,000 current US$
in 2003
Serbia
828,015 current US$
in 2023
Latvia rank
81st
Serbia rank
80th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps over time
- Latvia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 828,015 current US$ against 820,000 current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 8,015 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Serbia ahead.
Latvia ranks 81st and Serbia ranks 80th of 154 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 138,333 current US$ | 9.77 million current US$ | 9.63 million current US$ | Serbia |
| 2000s | 318,750 current US$ | 17.16 million current US$ | 16.84 million current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps, Latvia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 828,015 current US$ against 820,000 current US$ in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps between Latvia and Serbia?
- 8,015 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Serbia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2003.
- How do Latvia and Serbia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps?
- Latvia ranks 81st and Serbia ranks 80th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) with 495 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.