Least developed countries vs Libya: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps

Least developed countries
381.23 million current US$
in 2022
Libya
29.12 million current US$
in 2023
Least developed countries rank
10th
Libya rank
8th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Libya
0500.0M1.0B1.5B196019912023

How they compare

Least developed countries currently reports 381.23 million current US$ against 29.12 million current US$ in Libya, a difference of 352.11 million current US$.

That makes Least developed countries's figure about 13.1 times Libya's.

Across all 48 years both countries report, Least developed countries has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 10th and Libya ranks 8th of 44 groups.

Least developed countries has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Libya Difference Ahead
1970s 16.14 million current US$ 4.20 million current US$ 11.94 million current US$ Least developed countries
1980s 528.39 million current US$ 1.75 million current US$ 526.64 million current US$ Least developed countries
1990s 450.15 million current US$ 894,000 current US$ 449.26 million current US$ Least developed countries
2000s 339.50 million current US$ 3.57 million current US$ 335.93 million current US$ Least developed countries
2010s 309.39 million current US$ 12.81 million current US$ 296.58 million current US$ Least developed countries
2020s 520.75 million current US$ 33.41 million current US$ 487.34 million current US$ Least developed countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps, Least developed countries or Libya?
Least developed countries, at 381.23 million current US$ against 29.12 million current US$ in Libya as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps between Least developed countries and Libya?
352.11 million current US$, with Least developed countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Libya?
48 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Least developed countries and Libya rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps?
Least developed countries ranks 10th and Libya ranks 8th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Libya: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-gaps-filled/least-developed-countries-un-classification/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-gaps-filled/least-developed-countries-un-classification/libya/">Least developed countries vs Libya: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 9,001 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) with 495 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.