Russia vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current) … Italy gaps
Russia
1.02 million current US$
in 2004
Zambia
1.02 million current US$
in 2023
Russia rank
71st
Zambia rank
70th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current) … Italy gaps over time
- Russia
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 1.02 million current US$ against 1.02 million current US$ in Russia, a difference of 2,660 current US$.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Zambia ahead.
Russia ranks 71st and Zambia ranks 70th of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Russia averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.61 million current US$ | 11.10 million current US$ | 6.49 million current US$ | Zambia |
| 2000s | 39.14 million current US$ | 10.92 million current US$ | 28.22 million current US$ | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps, Russia or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 1.02 million current US$ against 1.02 million current US$ in Russia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps between Russia and Zambia?
- 2,660 current US$, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russia and Zambia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Russia and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps?
- Russia ranks 71st and Zambia ranks 70th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) with 495 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.