Central Europe and the Baltics vs Guinea-Bissau: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per

Central Europe and the Baltics
0.2536 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2011
Guinea-Bissau
23.72 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
41st
Guinea-Bissau rank
41st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Guinea-Bissau
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k197619992023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 23.72 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.2536 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 23.47 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 93.5 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 41st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 41st of 44 groups.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 35.3 current US$ per square kilometre 251.67 current US$ per square kilometre 216.37 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.4951 current US$ per square kilometre 277.56 current US$ per square kilometre 277.07 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s -0.6023 current US$ per square kilometre 18.67 current US$ per square kilometre 19.27 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per, Central Europe and the Baltics or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 23.72 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.2536 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per between Central Europe and the Baltics and Guinea-Bissau?
23.47 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Guinea-Bissau?
22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 41st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 41st of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Guinea-Bissau: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/guinea-bissau/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Guinea-Bissau: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 8,332 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.