Cuba vs Small states: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per

Cuba
68.08 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Small states
8.94 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Cuba rank
26th
Small states rank
29th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per over time

  • Cuba
  • Small states
02004006008001.0k196719952023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 68.08 current US$ per square kilometre against 8.94 current US$ per square kilometre in Small states, a difference of 59.14 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 7.6 times Small states's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 26th and Small states ranks 29th of 153 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Small states in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Small states Difference Ahead
1970s 1.41 current US$ per square kilometre 1.99 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5854 current US$ per square kilometre Small states
1980s 6.32 current US$ per square kilometre 62.16 current US$ per square kilometre 55.84 current US$ per square kilometre Small states
1990s 35.91 current US$ per square kilometre 78.03 current US$ per square kilometre 42.12 current US$ per square kilometre Small states
2000s 18.63 current US$ per square kilometre 37.85 current US$ per square kilometre 19.22 current US$ per square kilometre Small states
2010s 125.69 current US$ per square kilometre 31.18 current US$ per square kilometre 94.51 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 87.55 current US$ per square kilometre 6.06 current US$ per square kilometre 81.49 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per, Cuba or Small states?
Cuba, at 68.08 current US$ per square kilometre against 8.94 current US$ per square kilometre in Small states as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per between Cuba and Small states?
59.14 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Small states?
52 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2022.
How do Cuba and Small states rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
Cuba ranks 26th and Small states ranks 29th of 153 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Small states: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/small-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/small-states/">Cuba vs Small states: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 8,332 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.