Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Kiribati: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
19.04 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Kiribati
854.31 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2019
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
10th
Kiribati rank
7th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Kiribati
0200400600800197019962022

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 854.31 current US$ per square kilometre against 19.04 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 835.27 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 44.9 times Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 10th and Kiribati ranks 7th of 44 groups.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) Kiribati Difference Ahead
2000s 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre 74.07 current US$ per square kilometre 71.09 current US$ per square kilometre Kiribati
2010s 2.93 current US$ per square kilometre 532.35 current US$ per square kilometre 529.42 current US$ per square kilometre Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per, Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 854.31 current US$ per square kilometre against 19.04 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2019.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per between Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Kiribati?
835.27 current US$ per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Kiribati?
5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
How do Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Kiribati rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 10th and Kiribati ranks 7th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Kiribati: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/kiribati/">Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Kiribati: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 8,332 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.