Guatemala vs Libya: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per

Guatemala
15.84 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya
16.55 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
49th
Libya rank
48th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per over time

  • Guatemala
  • Libya
0100200300196119922023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 16.55 current US$ per square kilometre against 15.84 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.71 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Libya ahead.

Guatemala ranks 49th and Libya ranks 48th of 153 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 4 and Libya in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Libya Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0933 current US$ per square kilometre 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9388 current US$ per square kilometre Libya
1970s 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre 2.56 current US$ per square kilometre 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre Libya
1980s 53.73 current US$ per square kilometre 0.994 current US$ per square kilometre 52.74 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 43.53 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5081 current US$ per square kilometre 43.02 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 29.41 current US$ per square kilometre 2.03 current US$ per square kilometre 27.38 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 18.11 current US$ per square kilometre 7.28 current US$ per square kilometre 10.83 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 7 current US$ per square kilometre 18.38 current US$ per square kilometre 11.38 current US$ per square kilometre Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per, Guatemala or Libya?
Libya, at 16.55 current US$ per square kilometre against 15.84 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per between Guatemala and Libya?
0.71 current US$ per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Libya?
53 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Libya rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
Guatemala ranks 49th and Libya ranks 48th of 153 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Libya: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/libya/">Guatemala vs Libya: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 8,332 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.