IDA & IBRD total vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per

IDA & IBRD total
13.17 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Rwanda
122.86 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA & IBRD total rank
19th
Rwanda rank
21st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per over time

  • IDA & IBRD total
  • Rwanda
0200400600196919962023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 122.86 current US$ per square kilometre against 13.17 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 109.69 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 9.3 times IDA & IBRD total's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Rwanda ahead.

IDA & IBRD total ranks 19th and Rwanda ranks 21st of 44 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA & IBRD total Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 0.6644 current US$ per square kilometre 1.72 current US$ per square kilometre 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 13.73 current US$ per square kilometre 72.29 current US$ per square kilometre 58.56 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 13.92 current US$ per square kilometre 157.84 current US$ per square kilometre 143.92 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 10.85 current US$ per square kilometre 49.7 current US$ per square kilometre 38.84 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 5.89 current US$ per square kilometre 56.59 current US$ per square kilometre 50.7 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 10.92 current US$ per square kilometre 177.18 current US$ per square kilometre 166.26 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per, IDA & IBRD total or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 122.86 current US$ per square kilometre against 13.17 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per between IDA & IBRD total and Rwanda?
109.69 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and Rwanda?
50 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do IDA & IBRD total and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
IDA & IBRD total ranks 19th and Rwanda ranks 21st of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA & IBRD total vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-and-ibrd-total/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-and-ibrd-total/rwanda/">IDA & IBRD total vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 8,332 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.