Kenya vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per

Kenya
29.15 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
33.71 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kenya rank
36th
Uganda rank
35th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per over time

  • Kenya
  • Uganda
0100200300400196219922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 33.71 current US$ per square kilometre against 29.15 current US$ per square kilometre in Kenya, a difference of 4.56 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.2 times Kenya's.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Kenya ahead.

Kenya ranks 36th and Uganda ranks 35th of 153 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2196 current US$ per square kilometre -0.1001 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3197 current US$ per square kilometre Kenya
1970s 1.33 current US$ per square kilometre 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0756 current US$ per square kilometre Kenya
1980s 29.96 current US$ per square kilometre 56.3 current US$ per square kilometre 26.33 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
1990s 30.48 current US$ per square kilometre 98.6 current US$ per square kilometre 68.12 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2000s -8.12 current US$ per square kilometre 88.93 current US$ per square kilometre 97.06 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2010s 18.63 current US$ per square kilometre 30.94 current US$ per square kilometre 12.31 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2020s 25.77 current US$ per square kilometre 32.85 current US$ per square kilometre 7.08 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per, Kenya or Uganda?
Uganda, at 33.71 current US$ per square kilometre against 29.15 current US$ per square kilometre in Kenya as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per between Kenya and Uganda?
4.56 current US$ per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Uganda?
58 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Kenya and Uganda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
Kenya ranks 36th and Uganda ranks 35th of 153 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kenya/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-italy-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kenya/uganda/">Kenya vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 8,332 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.