Central Europe and the Baltics vs Equatorial Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), annual
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), annual over time
- Central Europe and the Baltics
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 565.62 % change on previous year against 384.85 % change on previous year in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 180.77 % change on previous year.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.5 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 4th of 44 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Europe and the Baltics | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 83.07 % change on previous year | 42.12 % change on previous year | 40.94 % change on previous year | Central Europe and the Baltics |
| 2000s | 45.59 % change on previous year | 203.25 % change on previous year | 157.66 % change on previous year | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 384.85 % change on previous year | 220 % change on previous year | 164.85 % change on previous year | Central Europe and the Baltics |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), annual, Central Europe and the Baltics or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 565.62 % change on previous year against 384.85 % change on previous year in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2022.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), annual between Central Europe and the Baltics and Equatorial Guinea?
- 180.77 % change on previous year, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Equatorial Guinea?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2010.
- How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), annual?
- Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 4th of 44 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.