Central Europe and the Baltics vs Grenada: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), annual

Central Europe and the Baltics
384.85 % change on previous year
in 2010
Grenada
959.01 % change on previous year
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
1st
Grenada rank
1st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), annual over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Grenada
02505007501.0k198320032023

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 959.01 % change on previous year against 384.85 % change on previous year in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 574.16 % change on previous year.

That makes Grenada's figure about 2.5 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Grenada ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 1st and Grenada ranks 1st of 44 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 1 and Grenada in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Grenada Difference Ahead
1990s 83.07 % change on previous year 37.77 % change on previous year 45.29 % change on previous year Central Europe and the Baltics
2000s 45.59 % change on previous year 100.91 % change on previous year 55.32 % change on previous year Grenada
2010s 384.85 % change on previous year 758.82 % change on previous year 373.98 % change on previous year Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), annual, Central Europe and the Baltics or Grenada?
Grenada, at 959.01 % change on previous year against 384.85 % change on previous year in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), annual between Central Europe and the Baltics and Grenada?
574.16 % change on previous year, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Grenada?
19 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2010.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Grenada rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), annual?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 1st and Grenada ranks 1st of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Grenada: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-annual-growth-rate/central-europe-and-the-baltics/grenada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-annual-growth-rate/central-europe-and-the-baltics/grenada/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Grenada: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 9,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.