Barbados vs Estonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps over time
- Barbados
- Estonia
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 1.20 million current US$ against 790,000 current US$ in Estonia, a difference of 410,000 current US$.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.5 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 123rd and Estonia ranks 126th of 173 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 142,500 current US$ | 165,000 current US$ | 22,500 current US$ | Estonia |
| 2000s | 552,000 current US$ | 620,000 current US$ | 68,000 current US$ | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps, Barbados or Estonia?
- Barbados, at 1.20 million current US$ against 790,000 current US$ in Estonia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps between Barbados and Estonia?
- 410,000 current US$, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Estonia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Barbados and Estonia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
- Barbados ranks 123rd and Estonia ranks 126th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.