Belize vs Qatar: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps
Belize
750,439 current US$
in 2023
Qatar
800,000 current US$
in 1995
Belize rank
128th
Qatar rank
125th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps over time
- Belize
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 800,000 current US$ against 750,439 current US$ in Belize, a difference of 49,561 current US$.
That makes Qatar's figure about 1.1 times Belize's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 128th and Qatar ranks 125th of 173 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 91,667 current US$ | 816,667 current US$ | 725,000 current US$ | Qatar |
| 1990s | 68,333 current US$ | 640,000 current US$ | 571,667 current US$ | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps, Belize or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 800,000 current US$ against 750,439 current US$ in Belize as of 1995.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps between Belize and Qatar?
- 49,561 current US$, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Qatar?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 1995.
- How do Belize and Qatar rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
- Belize ranks 128th and Qatar ranks 125th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.