Estonia vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps
Estonia
790,000 current US$
in 2004
Latvia
690,000 current US$
in 2004
Estonia rank
126th
Latvia rank
129th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps over time
- Estonia
- Latvia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 790,000 current US$ against 690,000 current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 100,000 current US$.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 126th and Latvia ranks 129th of 173 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 184,286 current US$ | 262,857 current US$ | 78,571 current US$ | Latvia |
| 2000s | 620,000 current US$ | 1.08 million current US$ | 456,000 current US$ | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps, Estonia or Latvia?
- Estonia, at 790,000 current US$ against 690,000 current US$ in Latvia as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps between Estonia and Latvia?
- 100,000 current US$, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Latvia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2004.
- How do Estonia and Latvia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
- Estonia ranks 126th and Latvia ranks 129th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.