Mali vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps

Mali
16.31 million current US$
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
16.94 million current US$
in 2023
Mali rank
61st
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
60th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps over time

  • Mali
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M196319932023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 16.94 million current US$ against 16.31 million current US$ in Mali, a difference of 624,700 current US$.

Across all 49 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.

Mali ranks 61st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 60th of 173 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1970s 1.65 million current US$ 8.30 million current US$ 6.65 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 7.92 million current US$ 45.25 million current US$ 37.33 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 23.41 million current US$ 80.78 million current US$ 57.38 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 22.96 million current US$ 165.14 million current US$ 142.17 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 22.66 million current US$ 117.55 million current US$ 94.89 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 11.78 million current US$ 33.53 million current US$ 21.75 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps, Mali or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 16.94 million current US$ against 16.31 million current US$ in Mali as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps between Mali and Tanzania, United Republic of?
624,700 current US$, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Tanzania, United Republic of?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Mali and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
Mali ranks 61st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 60th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-gaps-filled/mali/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-gaps-filled/mali/tanzania/">Mali vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 10,301 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.