Mexico vs Russia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current) … Japan gaps
Mexico
4.81 million current US$
in 2023
Russia
4.82 million current US$
in 2004
Mexico rank
95th
Russia rank
94th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current) … Japan gaps over time
- Mexico
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 4.82 million current US$ against 4.81 million current US$ in Mexico, a difference of 13,380 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 95th and Russia ranks 94th of 173 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and Russia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 97.93 million current US$ | 10.82 million current US$ | 87.11 million current US$ | Mexico |
| 2000s | -17.20 million current US$ | 5.19 million current US$ | 22.39 million current US$ | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps, Mexico or Russia?
- Russia, at 4.82 million current US$ against 4.81 million current US$ in Mexico as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps between Mexico and Russia?
- 13,380 current US$, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Russia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Mexico and Russia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
- Mexico ranks 95th and Russia ranks 94th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.