Montenegro vs Oman: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps over time
- Montenegro
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 1.50 million current US$ against 1.23 million current US$ in Montenegro, a difference of 271,490 current US$.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.2 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Oman ahead.
Montenegro ranks 122nd and Oman ranks 121st of 173 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Oman in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.11 million current US$ | 887,500 current US$ | 1.22 million current US$ | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 870,000 current US$ | 1.50 million current US$ | 630,000 current US$ | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps, Montenegro or Oman?
- Oman, at 1.50 million current US$ against 1.23 million current US$ in Montenegro as of 2010.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps between Montenegro and Oman?
- 271,490 current US$, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Oman?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2010.
- How do Montenegro and Oman rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
- Montenegro ranks 122nd and Oman ranks 121st of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.