OECD members vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps

OECD members
477.76 million current US$
in 2022
South Sudan
46.87 million current US$
in 2023
OECD members rank
35th
South Sudan rank
34th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps over time

  • OECD members
  • South Sudan
-500.0M-250.0M0250.0M500.0M197019962023

How they compare

OECD members currently reports 477.76 million current US$ against 46.87 million current US$ in South Sudan, a difference of 430.89 million current US$.

That makes OECD members's figure about 10.2 times South Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2011 it was South Sudan ahead.

OECD members ranks 35th and South Sudan ranks 34th of 45 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, OECD members averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s -27.37 million current US$ 54.22 million current US$ 81.59 million current US$ South Sudan
2020s 143.75 million current US$ 27.87 million current US$ 115.88 million current US$ OECD members

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps, OECD members or South Sudan?
OECD members, at 477.76 million current US$ against 46.87 million current US$ in South Sudan as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps between OECD members and South Sudan?
430.89 million current US$, with OECD members ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and South Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
How do OECD members and South Sudan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), gaps?
OECD members ranks 35th and South Sudan ranks 34th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-gaps-filled/oecd-members/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-gaps-filled/oecd-members/south-sudan/">OECD members vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 10,301 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) with 134 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.