Antigua and Barbuda vs Barbados: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

Antigua and Barbuda
4,239 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Barbados
2,791 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Antigua and Barbuda rank
16th
Barbados rank
19th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Barbados
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k197719992021

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 4,239 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,791 current US$ per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 1,448 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.5 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Barbados ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 16th and Barbados ranks 19th of 171 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 3 and Barbados in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Barbados Difference Ahead
1980s 90.91 current US$ per square kilometre 282.95 current US$ per square kilometre 192.04 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 3,773 current US$ per square kilometre 398.67 current US$ per square kilometre 3,374 current US$ per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 5,970 current US$ per square kilometre 867.44 current US$ per square kilometre 5,103 current US$ per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 15,364 current US$ per square kilometre 2,791 current US$ per square kilometre 12,573 current US$ per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, Antigua and Barbuda or Barbados?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 4,239 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,791 current US$ per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2021.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between Antigua and Barbuda and Barbados?
1,448 current US$ per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Barbados?
24 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2010.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Barbados rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 16th and Barbados ranks 19th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Barbados: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/barbados/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/barbados/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Barbados: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.