Barbados vs Pre-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

Barbados
2,791 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Pre-demographic dividend
88.48 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Barbados rank
19th
Pre-demographic dividend rank
21st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • Barbados
  • Pre-demographic dividend
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019962022

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 2,791 current US$ per square kilometre against 88.48 current US$ per square kilometre in Pre-demographic dividend, a difference of 2,703 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 31.5 times Pre-demographic dividend's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 19th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 21st of 171 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Pre-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1970s 38.76 current US$ per square kilometre 9.17 current US$ per square kilometre 29.59 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 258.14 current US$ per square kilometre 22.84 current US$ per square kilometre 235.3 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 388.37 current US$ per square kilometre 41.92 current US$ per square kilometre 346.45 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 867.44 current US$ per square kilometre 101.8 current US$ per square kilometre 765.64 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 2,791 current US$ per square kilometre 124.17 current US$ per square kilometre 2,667 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, Barbados or Pre-demographic dividend?
Barbados, at 2,791 current US$ per square kilometre against 88.48 current US$ per square kilometre in Pre-demographic dividend as of 2010.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between Barbados and Pre-demographic dividend?
2,703 current US$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Pre-demographic dividend?
34 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2010.
How do Barbados and Pre-demographic dividend rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
Barbados ranks 19th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 21st of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Pre-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/pre-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/pre-demographic-dividend/">Barbados vs Pre-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.