Belize vs Equatorial Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

Belize
32.9 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
27.7 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Belize rank
103rd
Equatorial Guinea rank
106th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • Belize
  • Equatorial Guinea
0100200300198320032023

How they compare

Belize currently reports 32.9 current US$ per square kilometre against 27.7 current US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 5.2 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Belize's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Belize ranks 103rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 106th of 171 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 3 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1980s 4.02 current US$ per square kilometre 15.57 current US$ per square kilometre 11.55 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 8.59 current US$ per square kilometre 25.2 current US$ per square kilometre 16.61 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 52.96 current US$ per square kilometre 2.21 current US$ per square kilometre 50.75 current US$ per square kilometre Belize
2010s 87.57 current US$ per square kilometre 4.97 current US$ per square kilometre 82.61 current US$ per square kilometre Belize
2020s 36.63 current US$ per square kilometre 11.56 current US$ per square kilometre 25.07 current US$ per square kilometre Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, Belize or Equatorial Guinea?
Belize, at 32.9 current US$ per square kilometre against 27.7 current US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
5.2 current US$ per square kilometre, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
38 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2022.
How do Belize and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
Belize ranks 103rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 106th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Equatorial Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belize/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belize/equatorial-guinea/">Belize vs Equatorial Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.