Burundi vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

Burundi
781.78 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
13.53 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Burundi rank
42nd
OECD members rank
41st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • Burundi
  • OECD members
05001.0k1.5k197019962023

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 781.78 current US$ per square kilometre against 13.53 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 768.25 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Burundi's figure about 57.8 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 42 shared years of data; in 1972 it was OECD members ahead.

Burundi ranks 42nd and OECD members ranks 41st of 171 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 5 and OECD members in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 0.3894 current US$ per square kilometre 3.27 current US$ per square kilometre 2.88 current US$ per square kilometre OECD members
1980s 198.4 current US$ per square kilometre 4.23 current US$ per square kilometre 194.17 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
1990s 275.46 current US$ per square kilometre 9.73 current US$ per square kilometre 265.73 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2000s 269.86 current US$ per square kilometre -0.6244 current US$ per square kilometre 270.48 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2010s 608.61 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8564 current US$ per square kilometre 607.75 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2020s 415.24 current US$ per square kilometre 4.07 current US$ per square kilometre 411.17 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, Burundi or OECD members?
Burundi, at 781.78 current US$ per square kilometre against 13.53 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between Burundi and OECD members?
768.25 current US$ per square kilometre, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and OECD members?
42 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2022.
How do Burundi and OECD members rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
Burundi ranks 42nd and OECD members ranks 41st of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/oecd-members/">Burundi vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.