Cape Verde vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

Cape Verde
819.9 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics
1.7 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Cape Verde rank
40th
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
43rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Central Europe and the Baltics
02.0k4.0k6.0k198020012023

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 819.9 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 818.2 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 481.5 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.

Cape Verde ranks 40th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 43rd of 171 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Central Europe and the Baltics Difference Ahead
1990s 1,163 current US$ per square kilometre 88.92 current US$ per square kilometre 1,074 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2000s 1,653 current US$ per square kilometre 37.71 current US$ per square kilometre 1,615 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 4,318 current US$ per square kilometre 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre 4,316 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, Cape Verde or Central Europe and the Baltics?
Cape Verde, at 819.9 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between Cape Verde and Central Europe and the Baltics?
818.2 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Central Europe and the Baltics?
21 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
How do Cape Verde and Central Europe and the Baltics rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
Cape Verde ranks 40th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 43rd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/central-europe-and-the-baltics/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/central-europe-and-the-baltics/">Cape Verde vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.