Costa Rica vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

Costa Rica
-60.48 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
-24.14 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
158th
Eswatini rank
155th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Eswatini
-50005001.0k1.5k196319932023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports -24.14 current US$ per square kilometre against -60.48 current US$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 36.34 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 158th and Eswatini ranks 155th of 171 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 67.33 current US$ per square kilometre 5.17 current US$ per square kilometre 62.16 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 67.04 current US$ per square kilometre 30.41 current US$ per square kilometre 36.63 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 262.59 current US$ per square kilometre 303.84 current US$ per square kilometre 41.24 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 112.44 current US$ per square kilometre 442.38 current US$ per square kilometre 329.95 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 420.84 current US$ per square kilometre 142.96 current US$ per square kilometre 277.88 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s -98.1 current US$ per square kilometre 179.23 current US$ per square kilometre 277.34 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, Costa Rica or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at -24.14 current US$ per square kilometre against -60.48 current US$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between Costa Rica and Eswatini?
36.34 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Eswatini?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Eswatini rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
Costa Rica ranks 158th and Eswatini ranks 155th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/eswatini/">Costa Rica vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.