East Asia & Pacific vs East Timor: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan … Japan square

East Asia & Pacific
65.65 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
1,857 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
27th
East Timor rank
25th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan … Japan square over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • East Timor
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 1,857 current US$ per square kilometre against 65.65 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 1,791 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes East Timor's figure about 28.3 times East Asia & Pacific's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1974 it was East Asia & Pacific ahead.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 27th and East Timor ranks 25th of 45 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific averaged higher in 2 and East Timor in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific East Timor Difference Ahead
1970s 26.4 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6725 current US$ per square kilometre 25.73 current US$ per square kilometre East Asia & Pacific
1990s 142.32 current US$ per square kilometre 13.79 current US$ per square kilometre 128.54 current US$ per square kilometre East Asia & Pacific
2000s 87.53 current US$ per square kilometre 1,138 current US$ per square kilometre 1,050 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 5.97 current US$ per square kilometre 1,853 current US$ per square kilometre 1,847 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 56.45 current US$ per square kilometre 1,479 current US$ per square kilometre 1,423 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, East Asia & Pacific or East Timor?
East Timor, at 1,857 current US$ per square kilometre against 65.65 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between East Asia & Pacific and East Timor?
1,791 current US$ per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and East Timor?
27 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and East Timor rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 27th and East Timor ranks 25th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs East Timor: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/timor-leste/">East Asia & Pacific vs East Timor: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.