El Salvador vs IBRD only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

El Salvador
2,000 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only
81.78 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
El Salvador rank
23rd
IBRD only rank
22nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • El Salvador
  • IBRD only
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 2,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 81.78 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 1,918 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 24.5 times IBRD only's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 23rd and IBRD only ranks 22nd of 171 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 4 and IBRD only in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador IBRD only Difference Ahead
1970s 136.37 current US$ per square kilometre 10.59 current US$ per square kilometre 125.78 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 18.44 current US$ per square kilometre 42.29 current US$ per square kilometre 23.85 current US$ per square kilometre IBRD only
1990s 1,644 current US$ per square kilometre 80.94 current US$ per square kilometre 1,563 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 1,389 current US$ per square kilometre 52.17 current US$ per square kilometre 1,337 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s -119.65 current US$ per square kilometre 12.12 current US$ per square kilometre 131.77 current US$ per square kilometre IBRD only
2020s 1,221 current US$ per square kilometre 50.4 current US$ per square kilometre 1,171 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, El Salvador or IBRD only?
El Salvador, at 2,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 81.78 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between El Salvador and IBRD only?
1,918 current US$ per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and IBRD only?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do El Salvador and IBRD only rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
El Salvador ranks 23rd and IBRD only ranks 22nd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs IBRD only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/ibrd-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/ibrd-only/">El Salvador vs IBRD only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.