El Salvador vs IDA blend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

El Salvador
2,000 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA blend
66.08 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
El Salvador rank
23rd
IDA blend rank
26th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • El Salvador
  • IDA blend
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 2,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 66.08 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA blend, a difference of 1,934 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 30.3 times IDA blend's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was IDA blend ahead.

El Salvador ranks 23rd and IDA blend ranks 26th of 171 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 4 and IDA blend in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador IDA blend Difference Ahead
1970s 136.37 current US$ per square kilometre 12.71 current US$ per square kilometre 123.66 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 18.44 current US$ per square kilometre 56.87 current US$ per square kilometre 38.43 current US$ per square kilometre IDA blend
1990s 1,644 current US$ per square kilometre 107.77 current US$ per square kilometre 1,536 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 1,389 current US$ per square kilometre 109.26 current US$ per square kilometre 1,280 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s -119.65 current US$ per square kilometre 110.63 current US$ per square kilometre 230.28 current US$ per square kilometre IDA blend
2020s 1,221 current US$ per square kilometre 153.33 current US$ per square kilometre 1,068 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, El Salvador or IDA blend?
El Salvador, at 2,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 66.08 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA blend as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between El Salvador and IDA blend?
1,934 current US$ per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and IDA blend?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do El Salvador and IDA blend rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
El Salvador ranks 23rd and IDA blend ranks 26th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs IDA blend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/ida-blend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/ida-blend/">El Salvador vs IDA blend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.