Guatemala vs Morocco: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

Guatemala
-1.48 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco
-7.79 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
148th
Morocco rank
150th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • Guatemala
  • Morocco
-2000200400600196719952023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports -1.48 current US$ per square kilometre against -7.79 current US$ per square kilometre in Morocco, a difference of 6.31 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Morocco ahead.

Guatemala ranks 148th and Morocco ranks 150th of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and Morocco in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Morocco Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0933 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2577 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1643 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
1970s 7.87 current US$ per square kilometre 3.95 current US$ per square kilometre 3.92 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 22 current US$ per square kilometre 40.15 current US$ per square kilometre 18.15 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
1990s 323.76 current US$ per square kilometre 105.89 current US$ per square kilometre 217.87 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 308.73 current US$ per square kilometre 146.13 current US$ per square kilometre 162.61 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 89.34 current US$ per square kilometre 105.1 current US$ per square kilometre 15.76 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
2020s 91.34 current US$ per square kilometre 95.93 current US$ per square kilometre 4.59 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, Guatemala or Morocco?
Guatemala, at -1.48 current US$ per square kilometre against -7.79 current US$ per square kilometre in Morocco as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between Guatemala and Morocco?
6.31 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Morocco?
56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Morocco rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
Guatemala ranks 148th and Morocco ranks 150th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Morocco: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/morocco/">Guatemala vs Morocco: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.