Hong Kong vs IDA & IBRD total: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan … Japan square

Hong Kong
5,581 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
IDA & IBRD total
114.25 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Hong Kong rank
15th
IDA & IBRD total rank
18th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan … Japan square over time

  • Hong Kong
  • IDA & IBRD total
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196319922022

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 5,581 current US$ per square kilometre against 114.25 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 5,467 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 48.8 times IDA & IBRD total's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 15th and IDA & IBRD total ranks 18th of 171 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong IDA & IBRD total Difference Ahead
1970s 431.86 current US$ per square kilometre 10.92 current US$ per square kilometre 420.95 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
1980s 1,934 current US$ per square kilometre 47.25 current US$ per square kilometre 1,887 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
1990s 6,415 current US$ per square kilometre 89.56 current US$ per square kilometre 6,325 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, Hong Kong or IDA & IBRD total?
Hong Kong, at 5,581 current US$ per square kilometre against 114.25 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total as of 1996.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between Hong Kong and IDA & IBRD total?
5,467 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and IDA & IBRD total?
27 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 1996.
How do Hong Kong and IDA & IBRD total rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
Hong Kong ranks 15th and IDA & IBRD total ranks 18th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs IDA & IBRD total: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/ida-and-ibrd-total/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/ida-and-ibrd-total/">Hong Kong vs IDA & IBRD total: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.