IBRD only vs East Timor: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

IBRD only
81.78 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
East Timor
1,857 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only rank
22nd
East Timor rank
25th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • IBRD only
  • East Timor
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019962023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 1,857 current US$ per square kilometre against 81.78 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 1,775 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes East Timor's figure about 22.7 times IBRD only's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1974 it was IBRD only ahead.

IBRD only ranks 22nd and East Timor ranks 25th of 45 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, IBRD only averaged higher in 2 and East Timor in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only East Timor Difference Ahead
1970s 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6725 current US$ per square kilometre 9.86 current US$ per square kilometre IBRD only
1990s 99.28 current US$ per square kilometre 13.79 current US$ per square kilometre 85.5 current US$ per square kilometre IBRD only
2000s 52.17 current US$ per square kilometre 1,138 current US$ per square kilometre 1,086 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 12.12 current US$ per square kilometre 1,853 current US$ per square kilometre 1,840 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 50.4 current US$ per square kilometre 1,354 current US$ per square kilometre 1,303 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, IBRD only or East Timor?
East Timor, at 1,857 current US$ per square kilometre against 81.78 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between IBRD only and East Timor?
1,775 current US$ per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and East Timor?
26 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2022.
How do IBRD only and East Timor rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
IBRD only ranks 22nd and East Timor ranks 25th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs East Timor: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/timor-leste/">IBRD only vs East Timor: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.