India vs Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

India
972.71 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan
1,026 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
India rank
37th
Jordan rank
36th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • India
  • Jordan
-2.0k02.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 1,026 current US$ per square kilometre against 972.71 current US$ per square kilometre in India, a difference of 53.29 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times India's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1965 it was India ahead.

India ranks 37th and Jordan ranks 36th of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, India averaged higher in 2 and Jordan in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 14.87 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1417 current US$ per square kilometre 14.73 current US$ per square kilometre India
1970s 16.28 current US$ per square kilometre 21.54 current US$ per square kilometre 5.26 current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
1980s 41.13 current US$ per square kilometre 184.83 current US$ per square kilometre 143.69 current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
1990s 178.34 current US$ per square kilometre 1,594 current US$ per square kilometre 1,416 current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
2000s 99.29 current US$ per square kilometre 71.08 current US$ per square kilometre 28.21 current US$ per square kilometre India
2010s 351.65 current US$ per square kilometre 368.45 current US$ per square kilometre 16.8 current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
2020s 751.87 current US$ per square kilometre 1,199 current US$ per square kilometre 447.08 current US$ per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, India or Jordan?
Jordan, at 1,026 current US$ per square kilometre against 972.71 current US$ per square kilometre in India as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between India and Jordan?
53.29 current US$ per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Jordan?
57 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do India and Jordan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
India ranks 37th and Jordan ranks 36th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/india/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/india/jordan/">India vs Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.