Kiribati vs Maldives: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

Kiribati
27,760 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Maldives
39,299 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati rank
4th
Maldives rank
3rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • Kiribati
  • Maldives
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196619942023

How they compare

Maldives currently reports 39,299 current US$ per square kilometre against 27,760 current US$ per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 11,539 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Maldives's figure about 1.4 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 4th and Maldives ranks 3rd of 171 countries.

Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Maldives Difference Ahead
1970s 555.56 current US$ per square kilometre 3,608 current US$ per square kilometre 3,053 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
1980s 4,174 current US$ per square kilometre 15,623 current US$ per square kilometre 11,449 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
1990s 9,312 current US$ per square kilometre 40,713 current US$ per square kilometre 31,401 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
2000s 9,022 current US$ per square kilometre 32,717 current US$ per square kilometre 23,694 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
2010s 11,252 current US$ per square kilometre 29,666 current US$ per square kilometre 18,414 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
2020s 12,153 current US$ per square kilometre 95,382 current US$ per square kilometre 83,230 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, Kiribati or Maldives?
Maldives, at 39,299 current US$ per square kilometre against 27,760 current US$ per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between Kiribati and Maldives?
11,539 current US$ per square kilometre, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Maldives?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Maldives rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
Kiribati ranks 4th and Maldives ranks 3rd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Maldives: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/maldives/">Kiribati vs Maldives: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.