Libya vs Mexico: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

Libya
3.09 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
2.47 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
139th
Mexico rank
142nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • Libya
  • Mexico
-50050100150196119922023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 3.09 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.47 current US$ per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 0.62 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.3 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Mexico ahead.

Libya ranks 139th and Mexico ranks 142nd of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 2 and Mexico in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0057 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0463 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0406 current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 0.041 current US$ per square kilometre 1.36 current US$ per square kilometre 1.31 current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 0.0693 current US$ per square kilometre 15.72 current US$ per square kilometre 15.65 current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 0.0261 current US$ per square kilometre 43.86 current US$ per square kilometre 43.83 current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 0.1216 current US$ per square kilometre -10.02 current US$ per square kilometre 10.14 current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2010s 1.94 current US$ per square kilometre -12.65 current US$ per square kilometre 14.58 current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2020s 4.65 current US$ per square kilometre 18.74 current US$ per square kilometre 14.09 current US$ per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, Libya or Mexico?
Libya, at 3.09 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.47 current US$ per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between Libya and Mexico?
0.62 current US$ per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Mexico?
47 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Libya and Mexico rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
Libya ranks 139th and Mexico ranks 142nd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Mexico: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/libya/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/libya/mexico/">Libya vs Mexico: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.