Low & middle income vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

Low & middle income
189 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
14,406 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low & middle income rank
12th
Tuvalu rank
9th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Tuvalu
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 14,406 current US$ per square kilometre against 189 current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income, a difference of 14,217 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tuvalu's figure about 76.2 times Low & middle income's.

Across all 43 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.

Low & middle income ranks 12th and Tuvalu ranks 9th of 45 groups.

Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1980s 54.77 current US$ per square kilometre 20,185 current US$ per square kilometre 20,130 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
1990s 115.04 current US$ per square kilometre 69,867 current US$ per square kilometre 69,752 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
2000s 95.25 current US$ per square kilometre 142,933 current US$ per square kilometre 142,838 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
2010s 89.18 current US$ per square kilometre 196,906 current US$ per square kilometre 196,817 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
2020s 161.21 current US$ per square kilometre 68,314 current US$ per square kilometre 68,152 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, Low & middle income or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 14,406 current US$ per square kilometre against 189 current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between Low & middle income and Tuvalu?
14,217 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Tuvalu?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Low & middle income and Tuvalu rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
Low & middle income ranks 12th and Tuvalu ranks 9th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-and-middle-income/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-and-middle-income/tuvalu/">Low & middle income vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.