Lower middle income vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

Lower middle income
444.96 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
14,406 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Lower middle income rank
6th
Tuvalu rank
9th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • Lower middle income
  • Tuvalu
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 14,406 current US$ per square kilometre against 444.96 current US$ per square kilometre in Lower middle income, a difference of 13,961 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tuvalu's figure about 32.4 times Lower middle income's.

Across all 43 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.

Lower middle income ranks 6th and Tuvalu ranks 9th of 45 groups.

Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lower middle income Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1980s 89.3 current US$ per square kilometre 20,185 current US$ per square kilometre 20,096 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
1990s 188.65 current US$ per square kilometre 69,867 current US$ per square kilometre 69,678 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
2000s 159.34 current US$ per square kilometre 142,933 current US$ per square kilometre 142,774 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
2010s 249.32 current US$ per square kilometre 196,906 current US$ per square kilometre 196,656 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
2020s 416.1 current US$ per square kilometre 68,314 current US$ per square kilometre 67,898 current US$ per square kilometre Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, Lower middle income or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 14,406 current US$ per square kilometre against 444.96 current US$ per square kilometre in Lower middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between Lower middle income and Tuvalu?
13,961 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Tuvalu?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Lower middle income and Tuvalu rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
Lower middle income ranks 6th and Tuvalu ranks 9th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lower middle income vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/lower-middle-income/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/lower-middle-income/tuvalu/">Lower middle income vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.