Malaysia vs Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

Malaysia
-177.41 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
-179.05 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia rank
166th
Pakistan rank
167th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • Malaysia
  • Pakistan
-1.0k01.0k196119922023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports -177.41 current US$ per square kilometre against -179.05 current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Pakistan ahead.

Malaysia ranks 166th and Pakistan ranks 167th of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 5.28 current US$ per square kilometre 25.16 current US$ per square kilometre 19.88 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1970s 100 current US$ per square kilometre 51.91 current US$ per square kilometre 48.1 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1980s 330.94 current US$ per square kilometre 170.77 current US$ per square kilometre 160.17 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1990s 102.84 current US$ per square kilometre 289.34 current US$ per square kilometre 186.5 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 321.1 current US$ per square kilometre 221.94 current US$ per square kilometre 99.16 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s -202.97 current US$ per square kilometre 176.24 current US$ per square kilometre 379.21 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s -209.66 current US$ per square kilometre -61.81 current US$ per square kilometre 147.85 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, Malaysia or Pakistan?
Malaysia, at -177.41 current US$ per square kilometre against -179.05 current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between Malaysia and Pakistan?
1.64 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malaysia and Pakistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
Malaysia ranks 166th and Pakistan ranks 167th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malaysia/pakistan/">Malaysia vs Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.