Mauritius vs Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

Mauritius
-756.42 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
-179.05 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
170th
Pakistan rank
167th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • Mauritius
  • Pakistan
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports -179.05 current US$ per square kilometre against -756.42 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 577.37 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Pakistan ahead.

Mauritius ranks 170th and Pakistan ranks 167th of 171 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 5 and Pakistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 477.83 current US$ per square kilometre 84.8 current US$ per square kilometre 393.04 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 1,766 current US$ per square kilometre 170.77 current US$ per square kilometre 1,595 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 1,856 current US$ per square kilometre 289.34 current US$ per square kilometre 1,567 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 1,487 current US$ per square kilometre 221.94 current US$ per square kilometre 1,265 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 65.77 current US$ per square kilometre 176.24 current US$ per square kilometre 110.47 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 37,943 current US$ per square kilometre -61.81 current US$ per square kilometre 38,005 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, Mauritius or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at -179.05 current US$ per square kilometre against -756.42 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between Mauritius and Pakistan?
577.37 current US$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Pakistan?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Pakistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
Mauritius ranks 170th and Pakistan ranks 167th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/pakistan/">Mauritius vs Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.