OECD members vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

OECD members
13.53 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Rwanda
898.31 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members rank
41st
Rwanda rank
38th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • OECD members
  • Rwanda
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019962023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 898.31 current US$ per square kilometre against 13.53 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 884.78 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 66.4 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was OECD members ahead.

OECD members ranks 41st and Rwanda ranks 38th of 45 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 3.12 current US$ per square kilometre 45.24 current US$ per square kilometre 42.11 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 4.23 current US$ per square kilometre 270.17 current US$ per square kilometre 265.93 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 7.6 current US$ per square kilometre 395.7 current US$ per square kilometre 388.1 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s -0.6244 current US$ per square kilometre 326.39 current US$ per square kilometre 327.01 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 0.8564 current US$ per square kilometre 1,443 current US$ per square kilometre 1,442 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 4.07 current US$ per square kilometre 2,627 current US$ per square kilometre 2,623 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, OECD members or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 898.31 current US$ per square kilometre against 13.53 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between OECD members and Rwanda?
884.78 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Rwanda?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do OECD members and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
OECD members ranks 41st and Rwanda ranks 38th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/rwanda/">OECD members vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.