Sao Tome and Principe vs Timor-Leste: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

Sao Tome and Principe
1,629 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Timor-Leste
1,857 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe rank
27th
Timor-Leste rank
25th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Timor-Leste
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197419982023

How they compare

Timor-Leste currently reports 1,857 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,629 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 228 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 27th and Timor-Leste ranks 25th of 171 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
1990s 2,224 current US$ per square kilometre 13.79 current US$ per square kilometre 2,210 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 1,949 current US$ per square kilometre 1,138 current US$ per square kilometre 811.16 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 2,856 current US$ per square kilometre 1,853 current US$ per square kilometre 1,004 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 2,756 current US$ per square kilometre 1,479 current US$ per square kilometre 1,276 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, Sao Tome and Principe or Timor-Leste?
Timor-Leste, at 1,857 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,629 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between Sao Tome and Principe and Timor-Leste?
228 current US$ per square kilometre, with Timor-Leste ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Timor-Leste?
26 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Timor-Leste rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 27th and Timor-Leste ranks 25th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Timor-Leste: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/timor-leste/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Timor-Leste: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.