Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) vs East Timor: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan … Japan square
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan … Japan square over time
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 1,857 current US$ per square kilometre against 71.11 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 1,786 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes East Timor's figure about 26.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 24th and East Timor ranks 25th of 45 groups.
Across the 5 decades both report, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) averaged higher in 2 and East Timor in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6725 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 1990s | 50.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.97 current US$ per square kilometre | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 2000s | 54.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,138 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,083 current US$ per square kilometre | East Timor |
| 2010s | 68.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,853 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,784 current US$ per square kilometre | East Timor |
| 2020s | 63.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,479 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,416 current US$ per square kilometre | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 1,857 current US$ per square kilometre against 71.11 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and East Timor?
- 1,786 current US$ per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and East Timor?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
- How do Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) and East Timor rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 24th and East Timor ranks 25th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.