Sub-Saharan Africa vs Timor-Leste: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per

Sub-Saharan Africa
71.11 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Timor-Leste
1,857 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
25th
Timor-Leste rank
25th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Timor-Leste
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Timor-Leste currently reports 1,857 current US$ per square kilometre against 71.11 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 1,786 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 26.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 25th and Timor-Leste ranks 25th of 45 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, Sub-Saharan Africa averaged higher in 2 and Timor-Leste in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
1970s 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6725 current US$ per square kilometre 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 50.76 current US$ per square kilometre 13.79 current US$ per square kilometre 36.97 current US$ per square kilometre Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 54.67 current US$ per square kilometre 1,138 current US$ per square kilometre 1,083 current US$ per square kilometre Timor-Leste
2010s 68.82 current US$ per square kilometre 1,853 current US$ per square kilometre 1,784 current US$ per square kilometre Timor-Leste
2020s 63.17 current US$ per square kilometre 1,479 current US$ per square kilometre 1,416 current US$ per square kilometre Timor-Leste

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per, Sub-Saharan Africa or Timor-Leste?
Timor-Leste, at 1,857 current US$ per square kilometre against 71.11 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per between Sub-Saharan Africa and Timor-Leste?
1,786 current US$ per square kilometre, with Timor-Leste ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Timor-Leste?
27 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Timor-Leste rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan (current us$), per?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 25th and Timor-Leste ranks 25th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Timor-Leste: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-japan-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/timor-leste/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Timor-Leste: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,977 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.