Bahamas vs New Caledonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan over time
- Bahamas
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 80,000 current US$ against 30,000 current US$ in New Caledonia, a difference of 50,000 current US$.
That makes Bahamas's figure about 2.7 times New Caledonia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1976 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Bahamas ranks 143rd and New Caledonia ranks 145th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 10,000 current US$ | 80,000 current US$ | 70,000 current US$ | New Caledonia |
| 1980s | 21,667 current US$ | 6,667 current US$ | 15,000 current US$ | Bahamas |
| 1990s | 54,000 current US$ | 88,000 current US$ | 34,000 current US$ | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan, Bahamas or New Caledonia?
- Bahamas, at 80,000 current US$ against 30,000 current US$ in New Caledonia as of 1995.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan between Bahamas and New Caledonia?
- 50,000 current US$, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and New Caledonia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 1995.
- How do Bahamas and New Caledonia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan?
- Bahamas ranks 143rd and New Caledonia ranks 145th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.