Belize vs Equatorial Guinea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan over time
- Belize
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 777,023 current US$ against 750,439 current US$ in Belize, a difference of 26,584 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Belize ranks 127th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 126th of 172 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 3 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 91,667 current US$ | 436,667 current US$ | 345,000 current US$ | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1990s | 196,000 current US$ | 707,000 current US$ | 511,000 current US$ | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 1.21 million current US$ | 62,000 current US$ | 1.15 million current US$ | Belize |
| 2010s | 2.00 million current US$ | 139,309 current US$ | 1.86 million current US$ | Belize |
| 2020s | 835,608 current US$ | 324,256 current US$ | 511,352 current US$ | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan, Belize or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 777,023 current US$ against 750,439 current US$ in Belize as of 2022.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan between Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
- 26,584 current US$, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2022.
- How do Belize and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, japan?
- Belize ranks 127th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 126th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.